<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears</id>
  <title type="text">TurboGears Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Discussion about the TurboGears front-to-back web development megaframework.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/turbogears/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="TurboGears feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-21T23:30:04Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.in" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Christoph Zwerschke</name>
  <email>c...@online.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T23:30:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/cbea3fd8cef0d357/45b4afade691b9b1?show_docid=45b4afade691b9b1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/cbea3fd8cef0d357/45b4afade691b9b1?show_docid=45b4afade691b9b1"/>
  <title type="text">[ANN] TurboGears 1.1.1 released</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On behalf of the TurboGears Team, I am pleased to announce that &lt;br&gt; TurboGears 1.1.1 is available for download at &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://turbogears.org&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; and the Python package index &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pypi.python.org/pypi/TurboGears&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; TurboGears 1.1.1 is the first bugfix release of the TurboGears 1.1 &lt;br&gt; branch, which is the evolution of the TurboGears 1 codebase. The 1.1
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Marco Mariani</name>
  <email>marco.mari...@prometeia.it</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T21:24:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/9dece3e81bdc1f60/f7bf00ca6481ae2f?show_docid=f7bf00ca6481ae2f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/9dece3e81bdc1f60/f7bf00ca6481ae2f?show_docid=f7bf00ca6481ae2f"/>
  <title type="text">TG2.1, sharing DB with TG1.1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hallo there! &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve began exploring TG2.1 today after years of 1.x, and I like it. &lt;br&gt; It would be nice to start writing new modules for an existing business &lt;br&gt; application, currently running under TG1.1. &lt;br&gt; The current app has been in production since 2007, and porting the &lt;br&gt; whole baby is unthinkable. Besides, I&#39;m quite satisfied by its
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>James</name>
  <email>rent.lupin.r...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T11:48:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/c2b46974eac9b942/7d66b8deb825ea8d?show_docid=7d66b8deb825ea8d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/c2b46974eac9b942/7d66b8deb825ea8d?show_docid=7d66b8deb825ea8d"/>
  <title type="text">Tracking DB connection usage</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; In a TG2 app, I have SQLAlchemy configured with a pool size of 30 &lt;br&gt; (overflow 30), and the Paste HTTP server configured to run with 50 &lt;br&gt; threads. There is a limit of a maximum 50 concurrent connections &lt;br&gt; coming to the server. &lt;br&gt; However, I am regularly seeing SQLAlchemy TimeoutErrors with no &lt;br&gt; connections available in the QueuePool. It seems that there should
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>James</name>
  <email>rent.lupin.r...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-20T11:34:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/a290a841b17a856f?show_docid=a290a841b17a856f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/a290a841b17a856f?show_docid=a290a841b17a856f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: When are controllers instantiated in TG2? Also: best practice to create (and pool?) expensive objects?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Great - I&#39;ve got a threadlocal connection set up and it works &lt;br&gt; perfectly. &lt;br&gt; Thanks Diez!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Lorance</name>
  <email>john.lora...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-19T17:23:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/6007765dd8a84c79?show_docid=6007765dd8a84c79</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/6007765dd8a84c79?show_docid=6007765dd8a84c79"/>
  <title type="text">Re: When are controllers instantiated in TG2? Also: best practice to create (and pool?) expensive objects?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks again for the clarification here.. I thought I would losing my &lt;br&gt; mind for a moment. So, yes, it becomes obvious that controllers that &lt;br&gt; are simply class attributes and behave as such, and controllers called &lt;br&gt; as part of the a _lookup method are normally instantiated objects that &lt;br&gt; are created and destroyed as appropriate to the request (per _lookup
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Diez B. Roggisch</name>
  <email>de...@web.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-19T15:27:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/b6b63eae12a3a450?show_docid=b6b63eae12a3a450</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/b6b63eae12a3a450?show_docid=b6b63eae12a3a450"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [TurboGears] Re: When are controllers instantiated in TG2? Also: best practice to create (and pool?) expensive objects?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 19.03.2010 um 15:51 schrieb John Lorance: &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s a different thing, yes. Maybe I was the dense here - but the OP &lt;br&gt; asked (IMHO) for the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; controller hierarchy &amp;amp; it&#39;s objects, &lt;br&gt; which (with the exception of the root) aren&#39;t instantiated after &lt;br&gt; initial load. Simply because they are *class*-attirbutes.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Lorance</name>
  <email>john.lora...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-19T14:51:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/42423ba83d7d41e3?show_docid=42423ba83d7d41e3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/42423ba83d7d41e3?show_docid=42423ba83d7d41e3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [TurboGears] Re: When are controllers instantiated in TG2? Also: best practice to create (and pool?) expensive objects?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks Diez. After a re-read of this thread, I am understanding this more &lt;br&gt; clearlt... just a weird situation to understand. Additionally, if I look at &lt;br&gt; the sample code: &lt;br&gt; class BlogController(BaseController) : &lt;br&gt; @expose() &lt;br&gt; def _lookup(self, year, month, day, id, *remainder): &lt;br&gt; dt = date(int(year), int(month), int(day))
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Diez B. Roggisch</name>
  <email>de...@web.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-19T09:09:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/4cd9a5d2bd9e2101/76e57ef4013e8ca2?show_docid=76e57ef4013e8ca2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/4cd9a5d2bd9e2101/76e57ef4013e8ca2?show_docid=76e57ef4013e8ca2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [TurboGears] cherrypy.HTTPRedirect vs. cherrypy.InternalRedirect</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Please don&#39;t hijack other threads &amp;amp; just change the subject. This is &lt;br&gt; very confusing for those who prefer their mails being threaded. &lt;br&gt; Well, the disadvantage is pretty much what you say yourself - the &lt;br&gt; browser doesn&#39;t change the url. This might be desirable, but can also &lt;br&gt; cause problems if the user hits &amp;quot;reload&amp;quot; and is asked if she&#39;s sure
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Diez B. Roggisch</name>
  <email>de...@web.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-19T09:06:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/92456af86ff54451?show_docid=92456af86ff54451</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/92456af86ff54451?show_docid=92456af86ff54451"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [TurboGears] Re: When are controllers instantiated in TG2? Also: best practice to create (and pool?) expensive objects?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Am 18.03.2010 um 18:53 schrieb John Lorance: &lt;br&gt; No. &lt;br&gt; No. &lt;br&gt; The only controller that currently gets instantiated on a per-request- &lt;br&gt; base is the root-controller. And I don&#39;t read anything else from the &lt;br&gt; _lookup/_default docs either. &lt;br&gt; HTH, &lt;br&gt; Diez
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Pedersen</name>
  <email>mjpe...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-16T04:26:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/0dc378cce94638a3/c3e28b5483d91860?show_docid=c3e28b5483d91860</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/0dc378cce94638a3/c3e28b5483d91860?show_docid=c3e28b5483d91860"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [TurboGears] Re: Install TG 2.1 on Centos issues</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  And, as you can now see at that ticket ( &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/2469&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ), I&#39;ve proffered up a fix that will &lt;br&gt; (hopefully) make it into the next release. Especially since it was me that &lt;br&gt; introduced the bug. Sorry about that.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tim Black</name>
  <email>t...@alwaysreformed.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-18T23:34:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5e4881358a034e6f/f4b604071d82bf0d?show_docid=f4b604071d82bf0d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5e4881358a034e6f/f4b604071d82bf0d?show_docid=f4b604071d82bf0d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [TurboGears] Where is the TG2.1 document?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The linked headings here &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://turbogears.org/2.1/docs/index.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;br&gt; no longer underlined when I mouseover them. Of course, my mouse pointer &lt;br&gt; turns into a hand, which means the headings are a link, but I still bet &lt;br&gt; other people are going to fail to find the documentation because it&#39;s &lt;br&gt; hard to know those headings are the only links into the documentation.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michal Pitonak</name>
  <email>pito...@fns.uniba.sk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-18T22:47:14Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/4cd9a5d2bd9e2101/317809eb12d03f4e?show_docid=317809eb12d03f4e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/4cd9a5d2bd9e2101/317809eb12d03f4e?show_docid=317809eb12d03f4e"/>
  <title type="text">cherrypy.HTTPRedirect vs. cherrypy.InternalRedirect</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Can I have a naive question? Is there is any hidden catch in using &lt;br&gt; cherrypy.InternalRedirect instead of cherrypy.HTTPRedirect (in deployed &lt;br&gt; application behind apache, https. ...)? I&#39;d like to use the &lt;br&gt; InternalRedirect because it hides (at least in the navigation bar) the &lt;br&gt; url parameters ... &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m using TurboGears 1.0.8.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Lorance</name>
  <email>john.lora...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-18T17:53:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/3f359f777941b4bc?show_docid=3f359f777941b4bc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5674a83591ad7248/3f359f777941b4bc?show_docid=3f359f777941b4bc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: When are controllers instantiated in TG2? Also: best practice to create (and pool?) expensive objects?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Diez, &lt;br&gt; Just so that I am reading you (and this thread) clearly here about &lt;br&gt; controller instantiation... all controller classes are instantiated as &lt;br&gt; objects on a per request basis.. yes? Therefore, if I have a sub &lt;br&gt; controller with an __init__ that does some work needed, common to all &lt;br&gt; my controller class methods, it can assign local (self) attributes in
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rotem Tamir</name>
  <email>rotemta...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-18T14:08:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/61988d8673e0cf6e/28881f6098c9fdda?show_docid=28881f6098c9fdda</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/61988d8673e0cf6e/28881f6098c9fdda?show_docid=28881f6098c9fdda"/>
  <title type="text">Re: tg/elixir question - select distinct problems..</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  diez &lt;br&gt; you have been of great help &lt;br&gt; my team thanks you very much, you have solved a great mystery for &lt;br&gt; us :) &lt;br&gt; rotem
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>robneville73</name>
  <email>robertnevill...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-18T13:51:12Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/7dd73065672744f9/5d6ab05fc9b9dc61?show_docid=5d6ab05fc9b9dc61</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/7dd73065672744f9/5d6ab05fc9b9dc61?show_docid=5d6ab05fc9b9dc61"/>
  <title type="text">Re: challenging issue with logging issues - need guru help please!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss/browse_thread/thread/9b9add4529b3779c&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; answered my question
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
