<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship</id>
  <title type="text">software_craftsmanship Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Discussion on the topic of Software Craftsmanship and group meetings.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/software_craftsmanship/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="software_craftsmanship feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-22T12:56:54Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.in" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rob Park</name>
  <email>robert.d.p...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-22T12:56:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/533ffeb4013a2a88?show_docid=533ffeb4013a2a88</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/533ffeb4013a2a88?show_docid=533ffeb4013a2a88"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You could also look at UncleBob&#39;s book Clean Code, which is in itself a sort &lt;br&gt; of collection of papers, each of which would be fun to discuss as a team.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will Sargent</name>
  <email>will.sarg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T21:13:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/b5aaad5e7b8f0e30?show_docid=b5aaad5e7b8f0e30</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/b5aaad5e7b8f0e30?show_docid=b5aaad5e7b8f0e30"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Re: Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Revised: it&#39;s really tough to pin Glass down. His essays are so damn &lt;br&gt; short. Honestly, reading Software Creativity is probably the best way &lt;br&gt; to absorb his ideas. &lt;br&gt; Will.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will Sargent</name>
  <email>will.sarg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T21:11:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/a8f8034eb3407989?show_docid=a8f8034eb3407989</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/a8f8034eb3407989?show_docid=a8f8034eb3407989"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Re: Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;The Importance of the Application Domain Cluster&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Does Good &lt;br&gt; Process Lead to Improved Product? A second opinion&amp;quot; are two really &lt;br&gt; good papers. &lt;br&gt; Will.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Zach Shaw</name>
  <email>zd...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T19:18:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/5423c2a4f653fb6a?show_docid=5423c2a4f653fb6a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/5423c2a4f653fb6a?show_docid=5423c2a4f653fb6a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Re: Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  These paper look great! thanks everybody. &lt;br&gt; So looks like the suggested reading list (in no particular order) is: &lt;br&gt; Mock Roles, not Objects from Freeman, Pryce, Mackinnon, Walnes &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.jmock.org/oopsla2004.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Testable Java from Feathers &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/TestableJava.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; David Parnas &amp;quot;A Rational Design Process: How and Why to Fake It&amp;quot;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Markus Gaertner</name>
  <email>mgaer...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T12:36:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/8a015ad583d195e2?show_docid=8a015ad583d195e2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/8a015ad583d195e2?show_docid=8a015ad583d195e2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Re: Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Reading SOLID and The Craftsman is a must from my perspective. Here two I &lt;br&gt; haven&#39;t found mentioned before: &lt;br&gt; Mock Roles, not Objects from Freeman, Pryce, Mackinnon, Walnes &lt;br&gt; Testable Java from Feathers &lt;br&gt; Kind regards &lt;br&gt; Markus Gaertner &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.shino.de&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kurt Häusler</name>
  <email>kurt.haeus...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T08:09:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/e3406176f27d3c65?show_docid=e3406176f27d3c65</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/e3406176f27d3c65?show_docid=e3406176f27d3c65"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Which SOLID papers? The old C++ ones from Uncle Bob? &lt;br&gt; A good updated version of those is Pablo&#39;s &amp;quot;SOLID E-Book&amp;quot;: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.lostechies.com/content/pablo_ebook.aspx&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Another couple of free e-books I like are: &lt;br&gt; Karl Seguin&#39;s &amp;quot;Foundations of Programming&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://codebetter.com/blogs/karlseguin/archive/2008/06/24/foundations-of-programming-ebook.aspx&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will Sargent</name>
  <email>will.sarg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T06:05:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/2ed0b5445f283df8?show_docid=2ed0b5445f283df8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/2ed0b5445f283df8?show_docid=2ed0b5445f283df8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Developers, programmers, or computer scientists and our heritage as craftsmen.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I think Yourdon specified them as &amp;quot;Mission Impossible&amp;quot; projects. &lt;br&gt; Will.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ben Rady</name>
  <email>benr...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T06:01:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/a0bdc1c3d56e865c?show_docid=a0bdc1c3d56e865c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/a0bdc1c3d56e865c?show_docid=a0bdc1c3d56e865c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Developers, programmers, or computer scientists and our heritage as craftsmen.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Right...so if situation B is a &amp;quot;death march&amp;quot;, situation A is... &lt;br&gt; ?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will Sargent</name>
  <email>will.sarg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T05:52:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/afcaea2d2831f171?show_docid=afcaea2d2831f171</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/afcaea2d2831f171?show_docid=afcaea2d2831f171"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Developers, programmers, or computer scientists and our heritage as craftsmen.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Working 80 hours a week because you want to is awesome. &lt;br&gt; Working 80 hours a week because you have to is FAIL. &lt;br&gt; Will.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will Sargent</name>
  <email>will.sarg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T05:48:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/2b003765b6d1d92e?show_docid=2b003765b6d1d92e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/2b003765b6d1d92e?show_docid=2b003765b6d1d92e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Err, Brooks, not Knuth. &lt;br&gt; Will.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dion A. Stewart</name>
  <email>dion.stew...@visi.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T05:26:44Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/59c8c2e2ff3e30fb?show_docid=59c8c2e2ff3e30fb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/59c8c2e2ff3e30fb?show_docid=59c8c2e2ff3e30fb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Michael Feathers posted a list of great &lt;br&gt; papers a while back:&amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://blog.objectmentor.com/articles/2009/02/26/10-papers-every-programmer-should-read-at-least-twice&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;DionOn &lt;br&gt; hoping to get a few good suggestions on papers (not &amp;gt;books) to read. The dev team at my company is pretty &lt;br&gt; evangelist. We &amp;gt;just finished reading the SOLID papers which we all loved &amp;gt;(One person even remarked: &amp;quot;I
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ben Rady</name>
  <email>benr...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T04:47:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/87443edeb86640bc?show_docid=87443edeb86640bc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/cdf1127bc810caa1/87443edeb86640bc?show_docid=87443edeb86640bc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Developers, programmers, or computer scientists and our heritage as craftsmen.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I think all night hack sessions fueled by passion and camaraderie (and &lt;br&gt; beer/soda and pizza) can be great experiences. 80 hour workweeks to meet &lt;br&gt; unreasonable and unsustainable deadlines feel like failure to me, and I have &lt;br&gt; no desire to repeat them. &lt;br&gt; I wish I had a better way to communicate the distinction between these two
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sukant Hajra</name>
  <email>33jlhr...@sneakemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T03:43:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/e5570b09d35a24f6?show_docid=e5570b09d35a24f6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/e5570b09d35a24f6?show_docid=e5570b09d35a24f6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Excerpts from Zach Shaw zdsbs-at-yahoo.com |Software Craftsmanship/mailing_lists|&#39;s message of Sat Mar 20 21:15:38 -0500 2010: &lt;br&gt; Hmm, I&#39;m all for papers, but I&#39;m wondering if reading books isn&#39;t a bad idea? &lt;br&gt; My argument would be something along the lines of: &lt;br&gt; - good books are probably easier to find
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will Sargent</name>
  <email>will.sarg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T03:34:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/142e59a4d7cced5c?show_docid=142e59a4d7cced5c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/142e59a4d7cced5c?show_docid=142e59a4d7cced5c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [SC] Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If you want papers, then David Parnas&#39;s work is still stellar.  His &amp;quot;A &lt;br&gt; Rational Design Process: How and Why to Fake It&amp;quot; is particularly good. &lt;br&gt; Robert Glass&#39;s essays will go where most essays won&#39;t. His output is &lt;br&gt; variable, but always interesting. &lt;br&gt; Knuth&#39;s &amp;quot;No Silver Bullet&amp;quot; is a classic, as is Reeve&#39;s &amp;quot;What is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Zach Shaw</name>
  <email>zd...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-21T02:15:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/5719d617530dc363?show_docid=5719d617530dc363</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/software_craftsmanship/browse_thread/thread/90d116e4faf3458d/5719d617530dc363?show_docid=5719d617530dc363"/>
  <title type="text">Good Papers?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi All, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m hoping to get a few good suggestions on papers (not books) to read. The dev team at my company is pretty young (no one over 6 years of doing dev) and I am the primary TDD / Pairing / craftsmanshipie evangelist. We just finished reading the SOLID papers which we all loved (One person even remarked: &amp;quot;I didn&#39;t know that I didn&#39;t understand OO until I read these papers&amp;quot;)! I&#39;m trying to keep the momentum going but I don&#39;t know what else to suggest to our team to read. So, I&#39;m looking for some suggestions of good papers that we can argue over (there&#39;s nothing better for learning than a good argument :)) and discuss.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
