sci.math Google Group

Re: Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.

magnetic.t...@yandex.ua (Magnetic) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:52:34 UT

Today morning they repeated yesturdays achivement.
But thre were no collisions yet.
The death is soon. :(
[link]
-----------
Proton, p = (uud).
Neutron, n = (udd).
Lambda, l = (uds).
Antiproton, p~ = (u~u~d~).
Antineutron, n~ = (u~d~d~).
Antilambda, l~ = (u~d~s~).
Hypertriton, T = (pnl).

Three square integer numbers

alainvergh...@gmail.com (alainverghote@gmail.com) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:28:36 UT

Good morning,
It deals with the decomposition of an integer n into several squares.
I've read so ;"Iff n <> 4^r*(8m+7) form ; m, r integer and r > -1
then it exists a triplet (a,b,c) such as n = (a^2+b^2+c^2) . (1)
Do we know numerical and litteral examples,
is it an easy proof of (1) ?
Thanks for comments,

Re: BEAUTIFUL DEAD SCIENCE

pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:55:30 UT

Beautiful dead science and doublethink:
The truth: Maxwell's theory says the speed of light does not depend on
the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed of the observer:
[link]
"Maxwell's theory of electricity and magnetism provides a successful
framework with which to study light. In this theory light is an

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

bho...@yahoo.com (Bill Hobba) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:39:40 UT

Where did you get that from? As a matter of fact Einsteins teacher
Minkowski discovered space-time - not Einstein. Note - discovered - not
made up. This is a discovery because he was the first to realize it
could be modeled geometrically. Einstein postulated the cosmological
constant - not made it up - there is a difference.

Re: JSH: Twin primes probability correlation

w.h.o...@example.com (Mark Murray) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:39:07 UT

And via Twitter:
> if i'm a loser then who the fuck can even dream they are a winner?
>
> 16 minutes ago via txt
So, with his blindfold firmly in place, James continues to blunder
around, accusing the sighted of willful refusal to see.
M

proving that preamble + 9th equivalent to all decisions must be a net-improvement to the world #15 logic look at USA Constitution

plutonium.archime...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:31:56 UT

Alright, I am ready to prove that the Preamble plus the 9th Amendment
are equivalent to the
statement: Given any Court with a decision, that the decision must be
a net overall improvement to the world.
(1*) Here is the Preamble to the US Constitution: "We the People of
the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

marshall.spi...@gmail.com (Marshall) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:29:17 UT

You know, I mostly think TP is a nut, and folks like Moe and Jesse
are top-drawer, but I have to point something out here. Yes, the
evidence that TP has provided is weak, and we can poke all manner
of holes in it and so forth. But crappy as it is, it still counts as
evidence.
What has been offered against it opinion.

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

noeinst...@bellsouth.net (NoEinstein) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:05:44 UT

Dear Mitch: There is no such thing as gravity waves! The reason?
Gravity over distances greater than a typical galactic interval gets
blocked because the ether density goes to zero. A galaxy will
scavenge the energy for making the stars from the ether just outside
the zone of the galaxy. That said, ether pressure can be increased due

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

noeinst...@bellsouth.net (NoEinstein) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:52:55 UT

Dear mpc755: Light 'quanta' (photons) definitely interact with
matter! Even though those quanta are tangles of IOTAs (the stuff of
the ether), the light interacts, primarily, with the surface of the
matter hit. Even so, there is always an associated elevation of the
objects' temperatures. 1/2 a phase after being hit by a photon, a

matrix problem

sehrawat.dushy...@gmail.com (dushya) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:47:41 UT

A is a matrix. B is its inverse. elements of A (and hence B) depend
diffentiably on some parameter s. the problem is to prove --
B(i,j)dA(j,i)/ds = (1/det(A)) d(det(A))/ds
where repeated indices on LHS are summed. det(A) means determinant of
A.
waiting for reply (with solution)
thanks

Re: 85 Days

tsbru...@dcn.davis.ca.us (TB) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:41:10 UT

0.6 x 85 days to Mother's Day on May 9.

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

noeinst...@bellsouth.net (NoEinstein) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:38:01 UT

Dear John: PD, who is hooked on the status quo in physics, probably
is referring to the supposed 'dark matter' not yet found—and wrongly
assumed to be super-massive Black Holes (sic!!!). Because Newton
never realized that very hot bodies have more gravity per unit of mass
than colder bodies, the estimated mass of a typical galaxy has been

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

noeinst...@bellsouth.net (NoEinstein) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:30:18 UT

Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: All matter must interact with light,
because matter doesn't exist which didn't at some point both give off
and receive photon energy. Black holes are energy that is so
concentrated that photons are unable to find a route out of the mix.
Nor is there a way for flowing ether to find a way IN. That's why

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

noeinst...@bellsouth.net (NoEinstein) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:23:14 UT

Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Einstein made up 'space-time' and the
cosmological constant. I have correctly determined, via clear
reasoning alone, that the mechanism of gravity is photon exchange that
results in ether flow. I have also reasoned that there was no Big
Bang. So, there is no need for a cosmological constant to explain

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

noeinst...@bellsouth.net (NoEinstein) — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:12:53 UT

Then, you must have been off the sauce when you wrote that. — NE —

sci.math Google Group

Re: Today night the physicists-criminals from CERN accelerated protons to the record energy 3.5 TeV per beam.

Three square integer numbers

Re: BEAUTIFUL DEAD SCIENCE

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

Re: JSH: Twin primes probability correlation

proving that preamble + 9th equivalent to all decisions must be a *net-improvement* to the world #15 logic look at USA Constitution

Re: 'When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

matrix problem

Re: 85 Days

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

proving that preamble + 9th equivalent to all decisions must be a net-improvement to the world #15 logic look at USA Constitution