We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless we have already divided it by time. T must already be there in the denominator if we want to multiply somthing by T. The primery function of time is (or we introduce time) to divide a 'quantity'. All calculations become easy if the division tells us number of primary objects in the 'thing' (quantity? system? set?). The primery object (every physical object) is subject-matter of science. In general what it means is, if the numerator is not an integer (number of primery objects) and it is a continuous quantity (like mass, length, energy etc.) then we are compelled to use the 'unit of time' as the primary object and this primary object (the unit of time) contains no information; it is always devoid of information. When we multiply by time, any 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not create any new information regarding change in the out side world. I wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
On 26 Sep 2002 12:43:45 -0700, vgopa...@rediffmail.com (V.Gopal) wrote:
>We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless we >have already divided it by time. T must already be there in the >denominator if we want to multiply somthing by T. The primery function >of time is (or we introduce time) to divide a 'quantity'. All >calculations become easy if the division tells us number of primary >objects in the 'thing' (quantity? system? set?). The primery object >(every physical object) is subject-matter of science. In general what >it means is, if the numerator is not an integer (number of primery >objects) and it is a continuous quantity (like mass, length, energy >etc.) then we are compelled to use the 'unit of time' as the primary >object and this primary object (the unit of time) contains no >information; it is always devoid of information. When we multiply by >time, any 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not >create any new information regarding change in the out side world. I >wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
You're a Troll. Give up.
---------------------------------------------------- Some people have got a mental horizon of radius zero and call it their point of view - David Hilbert
> We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless we > have already divided it by time. T must already be there in the > denominator if we want to multiply somthing by T. The primery function > of time is (or we introduce time) to divide a 'quantity'. All > calculations become easy if the division tells us number of primary > objects in the 'thing' (quantity? system? set?). The primery object > (every physical object) is subject-matter of science. In general what > it means is, if the numerator is not an integer (number of primery > objects) and it is a continuous quantity (like mass, length, energy > etc.) then we are compelled to use the 'unit of time' as the primary > object and this primary object (the unit of time) contains no > information; it is always devoid of information. When we multiply by > time, any 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not > create any new information regarding change in the out side world. I > wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
S=(1/2) t^2 given appropriate initial conditions..
> We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless > we have already divided it by time. [...] When we multiply by > time, any 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not > create any new information regarding change in the out side world. > I wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
> > We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless > > we have already divided it by time. [...] When we multiply by > > time, any 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not > > create any new information regarding change in the out side world. > > I wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
"Bob Pease" <bobpe...@concentric.net> wrote in message <news:an0oqp$sik@dispatch.concentric.net>... > "V.Gopal" <vgopa...@rediffmail.com> wrote in message > news:38af3945.0209261143.2f9553e0@posting.google.com... > > We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless we > > have already divided it by time. T must already be there in the > > denominator if we want to multiply somthing by T. The primery function > > of time is (or we introduce time) to divide a 'quantity'. All > > calculations become easy if the division tells us number of primary > > objects in the 'thing' (quantity? system? set?). The primery object > > (every physical object) is subject-matter of science. In general what > > it means is, if the numerator is not an integer (number of primery > > objects) and it is a continuous quantity (like mass, length, energy > > etc.) then we are compelled to use the 'unit of time' as the primary > > object and this primary object (the unit of time) contains no > > information; it is always devoid of information. When we multiply by > > time, any 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not > > create any new information regarding change in the out side world. I > > wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
> S=(1/2) t^2 given appropriate initial conditions..
> "Bob Pease" <bobpe...@concentric.net> wrote > > "V.Gopal" <vgopa...@rediffmail.com> wrote > > > We cannot multiply a 'thing' (quantity, number?) by time unless we > > > have already divided it by time. T must already be there in the > > > denominator if we want to multiply somthing by T. The primary > > > function of time is (or we introduce time) to divide a 'quantity'.
That's a totally new concept: time in each numerator!
> > > All calculations become easy if the division tells us number of > > > primary objects in the 'thing' (quantity? system? set?). > > > The primary object (every physical object) is subject-matter of > > > science. In general what it means is, if the numerator is not an > > > integer (number of primary objects) and it is a continuous > > > quantity (like mass, length, energy etc.) then we are compelled > > > to use the 'unit of time' as the primary object and this primary > > > object (the unit of time) contains no information;
Nor does this convoluted (dimensionless) text, really.
> > > it is always devoid of information. When we multiply by time, any > > > 'thing' that we have already divided by time, we do not create > > > any new information regarding change in the outside world. > > > I wish to know if there is any exception to this rule.
Would you believe anyoneproviding an exception, really?
> > S=(1/2) t^2 given appropriate initial conditions.. > > Plonk = Plonk rate* Reflex time > > Bye Bye > > Ge-plonk!!! -- RJ P
> Who is there? Zeno?
^ NB: No, Zero (you know: the one that does not exist;-) ...Go, pal.
|
