Yesterday I had installed RHEL-5 in my computer and have installed all the packages listed. I am having problems with my graphics. I am not getting the GUI. when I try to start GUI with the startx command, it gives the error: no screens found fatal error
I have ATI graphics card (Radeon 2300) I am not sure weather it is installed. installation was also done in text mode.
I am having problems with my graphics. I am not getting the GUI. when I try to start GUI with the startx command, it gives the error: no screens found fatal error
I have ATI graphics card (Radeon 2300) I am not sure weather it is installed. installation was also done in text mode.
Boot into runlevel 3. Check /etc/X11/xorg.conf about which display driver is configured there (I think it may be radeon or radeon-tp or something like that). Take a backup of the xorg.conf and run the command 'system-config-display --reconfig' and try to change the resolution to a lower value. Save it and try to go to runlevel 5. If this does not work, follow the above steps again (in runlevel 3) and after running the 'system-config-display --reconfig' check with the "vesa" driver. If that works, then issue is probably related to driver.
What's the output of 'lspci |grep VGA' and 'lspci -nvv |grep $(lspci|grep VGA|cut -f1 -d" ")' ?
> Boot into runlevel 3. Check /etc/X11/xorg.conf about which display driver is > configured there (I think it may be radeon or radeon-tp or something like > that). Take a backup of the xorg.conf and run the command > 'system-config-display --reconfig' and try to change the resolution to a > lower value. Save it and try to go to runlevel 5. If this does not work, > follow the above steps again (in runlevel 3) and after running the > 'system-config-display --reconfig' check with the "vesa" driver. If that > works, then issue is probably related to driver.
> What's the output of 'lspci |grep VGA' and 'lspci -nvv |grep $(lspci|grep > VGA|cut -f1 -d" ")' ?
> Swagato
I found a binary of ATI graphics driver downloaded long back. It successfully executed and my Graphics driver is installed. Thanks.
New Problems: For the first time I saw a Linux distro in which my ethernet is not getting detected. whenever I try to configure the IP address with ifconfig eth0 <IP add.> , it says - device not found. How can I install eth0? I also came accross a term - sonypi (Sony Programmable I/O Control Device Driver) Link: http://www.popies.net/sonypi/ it says, it is included in latest kernels. My system says it cannot find sonypi (means not installed) what is the command to check the version of kernel?
Any suggession for RHEL-5 is welcome. I want to prepare for RHCE.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Rohit Gupta<rohit.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggession for RHEL-5 is welcome. I want to prepare for RHCE.
1. First make up your mind if your alleged "problem" is with RHCE or RHEL. If you have a problem with RHCE, the only people who can do anything for your would be:
(b) the Indian legal system - you can petition the courts.
> New Problems: > For the first time I saw a Linux distro in which my ethernet is not > getting detected. whenever I try to configure the IP address with > ifconfig eth0 <IP add.> , it says - device not found. > How can I install eth0? > I also came accross a term - sonypi (Sony Programmable I/O Control > Device Driver) > Link: http://www.popies.net/sonypi/ > it says, it is included in latest kernels. My system says it cannot > find sonypi (means not installed) > what is the command to check the version of kernel?
2. If however, your "problems" are with RHEL 5 then you are probably a significant part of the "problem". RHEL is designed for enterprise and commercial use, where the focus is on stability and performance. Of making sure that things work reliably over time, instead of breaking down and not working.
There are list of hardware and peripheral components that are tested and certified to work on different RHEL version and architecture. If your system is not part of that list and doesn't, well then tough luck. To know more about the list see https://hardware.redhat.com/
The focus of RHEL is on stability and reliability over a period of time, as you will note that the version of kernel supplied by the latest RHEL version is usually a good many versions older compared to a latest Fedora kernel. The device driver support comes from the kernel. So newer the kernel, so much better the chance of the latest hardware being supported.
You need to remember that a Fedora version has a maximum lifecycle of 18 months (1.5 years) after which it reaches its end-of-life. Compared to that a RHEL version is usually around for 84 months (7 years). You can read more from here http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/
I wish you all the best in becoming an RHCE. But if your latest hardware doesn't work on RHEL5 its you who is to blame. Learn to choose the right tool for the right job.
New Problems: For the first time I saw a Linux distro in which my ethernet is not getting detected. whenever I try to configure the IP address with ifconfig eth0 <IP add.> , it says - device not found. How can I install eth0?
What's the make/model of the NIC? Check whether the NIC shows up in 'lspci' output. Check whether /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 is present or not. What's mentioned in /etc/modprobe.conf? If the driver is not inbuilt, then probably you need to download the same from the manufacturers website (also sometimes given in the CD accompanying NIC) and compile it. The steps are generally given in the readme files.
I also came accross a term - sonypi (Sony Programmable I/O Control Device Driver) Link: http://www.popies.net/sonypi/ it says, it is included in latest kernels. My system says it cannot find sonypi (means not installed) what is the command to check the version of kernel?
'uname -a' will give you a lot of information including the kernel.
I totally agree with indranil da about RHEL and RHCE but with hardware, I can't help myself with a different one at present. I think ATI is also not supported by RHEL but I was able to install the ATI Graphics card from its binary, downloaded from the ATI website. I am wondering, if I can get something similar for my ethernet card and it starts working.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Swagato Paul<swagato_p...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Hello,
> New Problems: > For the first time I saw a Linux distro in which my ethernet is not > getting detected. whenever I try to configure the IP address with > ifconfig eth0 <IP add.> , it says - device not found. > How can I install eth0?
> What's the make/model of the NIC? Check whether the NIC shows up in 'lspci' > output. Check whether /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 is present > or not. What's mentioned in /etc/modprobe.conf? If the driver is not > inbuilt, then probably you need to download the same from the manufacturers > website (also sometimes given in the CD accompanying NIC) and compile it. > The steps are generally given in the readme files.
If a paying customer of RHEL installs a non-RHEL kernel (as any latest kernel is going to be) on a paid-for RHEL box, it will invalidate the RHEL support agreement and license
just a word of advice from someone who has been a part of the Red Hat Ready Business Partner program as a FOSS support company
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Indranil Das Gupta<indr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rohit and other RHCE wannabes on the list,
> If a paying customer of RHEL installs a non-RHEL kernel (as any latest > kernel is going to be) on a paid-for RHEL box, it will invalidate the > RHEL support agreement and license
Can I get the latest RHEL Kernel?
> just a word of advice from someone who has been a part of the Red Hat > Ready Business Partner program as a FOSS support company
Sorry to say but I am not paying for RHEL now. just using the trial.
I want to keep both the kernels. I am thinking of saving a backup of the present kernel and then adding a grub boot entry for both the kernels. I am just keen on getting comfortable with RHEL first and then experiment with all needed.
--- On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Rohit Gupta<rohit.k...@gmail.com> wrote: | Can I get the latest RHEL Kernel? | | Sorry to say but I am not paying for RHEL now. just using the trial. \--
Then switch to CentOS.
--- | I am just keen on getting comfortable with RHEL first and then | experiment with all needed. \--
What do you mean by 'comfortable'? What are you 'experimenting'?
> If a paying customer of RHEL installs a non-RHEL kernel (as any latest > kernel is going to be) on a paid-for RHEL box, it will invalidate the > RHEL support agreement and license
Can I get the latest RHEL Kernel?
No. Only paying customers can get the updated packages. In fact, you need to have a subscription for downloading RHEL ISOs. I think you are using the RHEL media provided along with the course books.
Swagato
See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Swagato Paul<swagato_p...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>> Rohit and other RHCE wannabes on the list,
>> If a paying customer of RHEL installs a non-RHEL kernel (as any latest >> kernel is going to be) on a paid-for RHEL box, it will invalidate the >> RHEL support agreement and license
> Can I get the latest RHEL Kernel?
> No. Only paying customers can get the updated packages. In fact, you need to > have a subscription for downloading RHEL ISOs. I think you are using the > RHEL media provided along with the course books.
Adding to that, Red Hat generally allows for evaluation. Writing to them (or their local offices) for "eval copy" of RHEL usually works.
If you want the updates, then you can pull in from CentOS repos. CentOS is 100% ABI compatible with RHEL binaries. In fact they are built from the same RHEL source packages. Which is why if you wish to "practise RHEL" just install CentOS and be happy, you will have the same as a RHEL install except for the trademarked artwork
tried to compile the kernel in RHEL, got the error as old version of gcc. so I downloaded the latest version of gcc. when i tried to install gcc, there is a dependency conflict ( glibc ) which conflicts with its own older version. the old version cannot be removed because more than thousand package depends on it. then I compiled the kernel in fedora 10 (make command) and did rest in RHEL and the new kernel got installed but when I boot on this kernel, it says kernel panic. However, the latest kernel got very well installed in fedora (version 2.6.30).
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Rohit Gupta<rohit.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tried to compile the kernel in RHEL, got the error as old version of
> gcc. so I downloaded the latest version of gcc.
> when i tried to install gcc, there is a dependency conflict ( glibc )
> which conflicts with its own older version.
> the old version cannot be removed because more than thousand package
> depends on it.
Isn't that obvious?
> then I compiled the kernel in fedora 10 (make command) and did rest in
> RHEL and the new kernel got installed but when I boot on this kernel,
> it says kernel panic.
> However, the latest kernel got very well installed in fedora (version 2.6.30).
How will a kernel compiled with some other version and libraries work?
Use common sense. If you are so desperate to get a feel of RHEL, use
CentOS as idg suggested.
> Thanks.
> Regards:
> Rohit Gupta
> KGEC
-- Regards
Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury
Fedora Ambassador
sherry...@gmail.com